Question: Is deterrence still a useful strategic concept
페이지 정보
작성일 23-02-12 16:22
본문
Download : Question Is deterren.doc
3. Conclusion
영국 런던대학교에서 국제 관계학 석사 과정을 들을면서 작성했던 중간고사 영문 에세이입니다. 국제 안보라는 수업을 수강하며 작성한 것으로 냉전 이후 시대에도 억지력이 아직 유효한 전쟁 억지 전략인가를 질문으로 연구한 글입니다.
참고 資料
Keegan, John (1998), War and Our World, London
Freedman, Lawrence (2003), The Revolution of Nuclear Strategy, London: Palgrave
Levine, David K. & Levine, Robert A.(2006), ‘DETERRENCE IN THE COLD WAR AND THE ‘WAR ON TERROR’, Defence and Peace Economics, Vol. 17(6), December, pp. 605–617
iii. Bipolar vs. unipolar world
Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein (1989), `Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think, Therefore I Deter`, World Politics Vol. 41, No. 2: 208-224
Freedman, Lawrence (2005), Deterrence, Cambridge: Polity, chaps. 2-3, 8
설명
Thayer, BRADLEY A. (2007), ‘Thinking about Nuclear Deterrence Theory: Why Evolutionary Psychology Undermines Its Rational Actor Assumptions’, Comparative Strategy, 26:311–323
Gray, Colin S. (1999), Modern Strategy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, chaps, 11-12
It is hard to say whether such deterrence is still a useful strategic concept in the post-Cold War world because the international circumstances have changed in many ways since the end of the Cold War. It can be argued, however, that nuclear weapons have become less effective as a deterrent in the post-Cold War world than they were in the Cold War era. Nevertheless, we should keep in mind that nuclear weapons are still important in the contemporary world as seen in that ‘nuclear weapons remain the most awesome disciplinary instrument around’ (Freedman, 2005:121).
Bibliography
Download : Question Is deterren.doc( 13 )
국제안보 보안 전쟁 억지력 냉전 이후 시대 Is deterrence still
i. The vertical vs. the horizontal proliferation
다.
Ferris, (2007) `Conventional Power and Contemporary Warfare`, in Baylis, et al.(eds), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, chap. 12
After 1945, state leaders endeavoured to ban wars between states and in fact, the world has experienced few major wars since the end of the Second World War. This era was called the Cold War and it continued until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. During the Cold War, the strategy of deterrence worked effectively to prevent the Soviet Union from invading North Atlantic Treaty Organisation(NATO) countries. More specifically, nuclear weapons between two superpowers, the United Sates and the Soviet Union worked as a deterrent against mutually destructive wars (Walton & Gray, 2007: 209).
Question: Is deterrence still a useful strategic concept
Freedman, Lawrence (1994), War, Oxford: Oxford University Press, Section E
국제 안보라는 수업을 수강하며 작성한 것으로 냉전 이후 시대에도 억지력이 아직 유효한 전쟁 억지 전략(strategy)인가를 질문으로 연구한 글입니다.
레포트 > 사회과학계열
Jervis, Robert (1989), The meaning of the Nuclear Revolution: Statecraft and the Prospect of Armageddon, Ithaca: Cornel University Press, chaps. 1&2
Wohlstetter, Albert (1959), `The Delicate Balance of Terror`, Foreign Affairs Vol. 37 (January): 209-234
1. Introduction
순서
Since the beginning of human history, the world has continuously witnessed small and large-scale warfare among groups or states. There are a variety of reasons why state leaders wage a war, including religious, territorial, political, economic and cultural issues. State leaders and military strategists, however, do not engage in a war recklessly because they know how devastating a war can be. In particular, through the two most horrible world wars, the world suffered enormous damage and recognized that a war should be avoided.
ii. Rationality vs. irrationality
1. Introduction
Lieber, Keir A. and Daryl G. Press (2006), `The rise of U.S. Nuclear Primacy`, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 2:42-54
Walton and Gray, (2007) `The Second Nuclear Age: Nuclear Weapons in the Twenty-First Century`, in Baylis, et al.(eds), Strategy in the Contemporary World, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, chap. 10
Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (1994), Joint Pub. 1-02, Washington, D.C.:GPO
Jervis, Robert (1988), `The Political Effects of Nuclear Weapons`, International Security, 13 (Fall): 80-90
2. Is nuclear deterrence still useful?
Payne, Keith B.(1996), Deterrence in the Second Nuclear Age, The University Press of Kentucky
영국 런던대학교에서 국제 관계학 석사 과정을 들을면서 작성했던 중간고사 영문 에세이입니다.
